Re: You said the J word

[noel@es.su.oz.au]

    From:	Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>
    Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 1992 07:44:09 +1000
    To:	Paul Haahr <haahr@mv.us.adobe.com>
    Cc:	Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.pixar.com>,
    	es mailing list <es@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu>,
    	bruce@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
    Subject: Re: You said the J word 
    Received: from ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca ([128.100.102.3]) by quux.es.su.oz.au with SMTP id <14630>; Thu, 22 Oct 1992 07:47:43 +1000
    Received: from hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu ([128.100.102.51]) by ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <9238>; Wed, 21 Oct 1992 17:47:05 -0400
    Received: from pixar.com ([138.72.10.20]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2780>; Wed, 21 Oct 1992 17:44:23 -0400
    Received: from copland.pixar.com by pixar.com (4.1/NBN-15/PIX-36)
    	id AA08756; Wed, 21 Oct 92 14:44:12 PDT
    Received: by copland.pixar.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.14)
    	id <m0mhnqc-0000rEC@copland.pixar.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 92 14:44 PDT
    Message-Id: <m0mhnqc-0000rEC@copland.pixar.com>
    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Oct 92 14:12:09 PDT."
                 <9210212112.AA10597@utopia.mv.us.adobe.com> 
	.
	.
	.

    Regarding the posibility of job control - I wouldn't try to implement it
    the way it is in BSD. Something using PTYs would be easier, and could
    be made to work close to the BSD semantics. The result would be sort of
    a cross between the ATT shell-levels and CSH job control.

there should be NO JOB CONTROL in es.