[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: for



Actually, I thought of the same thing too when I first ``met'' es.  I
thought that as ``while'' took program fragments, so would ``for''.  I
looked into the source code and realized why ``for'' is like the way it is,
because it is a binder like let/local.

I suppose I would have liked it to be as the other primitives, but I don't
think it actually would be that easy to change it to a primitive.

Pete.