Re: a note on notations

[peter@robots.oxford.ac.uk]

> while we're on the topic of syntax, anybody got a suggestion for the hook
> function that goes with the new <>?
> 	%openrw
> 	%openboth
> 	%open-modify
> all seem bad?  anybody got something nice and catchy?
> 

I think it shouldn't be %open-modify because that suggests to me that the
function will not clobber the file.  What about %open-create because it has
the semantics of both the %open and %create functions?

Pete.