>[ waiting for a new version of es? ] > >i don't think so, unfortunately. i'm sad to say that i think we've played with >es, had some fun, then got back to real work, and it's gathered dust on the >shelf (or at least, the *real* features of the shell have). a shame, but true. Actually, I have been using es for real work and I occasionally tell Paul about bugs I encounter along the way.